Offer: We're offering Virgo free to our first design partners, on their own infrastructure. Book a demo

When an engineer leaves, their reasoning walks out with them.

The reasons behind your systems live in people’s heads and in threads nobody linked. Most never make it into a doc. Virgo captures that context while the work happens, and keeps it after the people who created it have moved on.

new-hire: claude
sourcesADR-31PR #2214#search-engAUTH-77
⏎ send · esc to interrupt

The person who knew is gone

A new engineer hits a strange line in the search service. The author left in January, and every trail that should explain it has gone cold.

Captured while she was still here.

The cache decision was never one document. It was a ticket, a review, a thread, an ADR, and a pull request, spread over weeks. Virgo connected them into the reasoning graph as each one happened, months before anyone knew the context would be needed.

Your whole team queries one reasoning graph.

Virgo kept the decision while the work happened. One question brings back why the cache exists, from the artifacts Priya left behind.

new-hire: claude
⏎ send · esc to interrupt

Agents inherit the reasoning of engineers who left.

The graph answers the new hire and the agent from the same preserved decisions.

For engineers

Onboard from what the team already decided.

Ask about the system in your own words. The design, the constraint, and the incident behind it come back cited, even when their author is gone.

  • The decision: ADR-31, still citable.
  • The reason: the latency spike behind it.
  • The author: preserved with provenance.
For AI agents

Agents reason from decisions no one is left to explain.

An agent touching the search cache reads ADR-31 and the invalidation rule over MCP. It works within the decision instead of guessing at it.

61%lose 30+ minutes a day searching

Stack Overflow 2024 Developer Survey. The reasoning exists; keeping it reachable is the difference.