@priya
Wrote the cache.
The reasons behind your systems live in people’s heads and in threads nobody linked. Most never make it into a doc. Virgo captures that context while the work happens, and keeps it after the people who created it have moved on.
A new engineer hits a strange line in the search service. The author left in January, and every trail that should explain it has gone cold.
Wrote the cache.
Commit by Priya, last October.
The thread scrolled away.
I'll leave it alone. Hope it's not important.
Last edited before the cache.
Half-remembers a latency push.
Covers setup, not decisions.
The cache decision was never one document. It was a ticket, a review, a thread, an ADR, and a pull request, spread over weeks. Virgo connected them into the reasoning graph as each one happened, months before anyone knew the context would be needed.
Virgo kept the decision while the work happened. One question brings back why the cache exists, from the artifacts Priya left behind.
The graph answers the new hire and the agent from the same preserved decisions.
Ask about the system in your own words. The design, the constraint, and the incident behind it come back cited, even when their author is gone.
An agent touching the search cache reads ADR-31 and the invalidation rule over MCP. It works within the decision instead of guessing at it.
Stack Overflow 2024 Developer Survey. The reasoning exists; keeping it reachable is the difference.